Swaps data: IM grows in listed and OTC markets

Data shows fourth-quarter jump in IM across all product groups and after-effects of Nasdaq losses

The fourth quarter of 2018 was a time for soul searching at the world’s largest clearing houses, as margin models were called into question in the wake of a €114 million ($127.6 billion) loss at Nasdaq Commodities.

A new set of quantitative disclosures from the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and International Organization of Securities Commissions hint at the extreme energy moves that triggered the losses – perhaps most evident in Ice Futures Europe’s eighteen-fold year-on-year jump in credit exposure to a single participant. 

The figures show a clear increase in initial margin backing all major product groups – both over-the-counter and listed derivatives – in the 12 months leading up to the end of December. 

Cleared interest rate swaps consumed 9% more IM than a year previously. LCH continued to dominate with $137 billion of interest rate swaps margin – up 16%. But momentum was firmly behind Eurex, where IRS margin jumped by 40% – driven perhaps by Brexit-related transfers. There is no sign of LCH’s crown being taken any time soon though, as the Frankfurt-based clearer had just $5 billion of initial margin backing cleared interest rate swaps. 

There are many factors at play. In OTC markets, more players were incentivised to clear their derivatives exposures as phase three implementation of uncleared margin rules kicked in on September 1, bringing smaller dealers and the first buy-side firm into scope for initial margin on bilateral trades. In listed markets, where IM jumped by 13%, surging year-end equity volatility may also have contributed.

When it comes to credit risk, the picture is mixed. The Options Clearing Corporation estimates its largest aggregate stress loss on the default of a single participant at $4.1 billion, slightly down on a year earlier. LCH’s peak stress loss, at $4 billion, jumped 48% compared with a year previously. 

Cleared interest rate swaps

Let’s start with the largest over-the-counter product, interest rate swaps and quarterly trends.

clarus1-0519.jpg

Figure 1 shows:

  • LCH SwapClear the largest with $137 billion initial margin on December 31, 2018, which is up 16% in sterling terms from a year earlier, an absolute amount of £14.7 billion ($19.2 billion).
  • CME IRS is next with $24.7 billion, up 3% from a year earlier.
  • JSCC IRS with $6.3 billion, up 6% in yen terms. 
  • Eurex IRS with $5 billion, up 40% in euro terms.

The cumulative total for these four clearing services is $173 billion on December 31, 2018, an increase of 9% from the $159 billion a year earlier.

Cleared credit default swaps

Let’s turn next to credit default swaps, both index and single name.

clarus2-0519.jpg

Figure 2 shows:

  • Ice Clear Credit the largest with $34.2 billion, up 37% or $9.3 billion from a year earlier.
  • Ice Clear Europe is next with $6.9 billion, up 12% in euro terms. 
  • LCH CDSClear with $3.3 billion, up 42% in euro terms.
  • CME CDS is no longer active.

The cumulative total for these three clearing services is $44.4 billion on December 31, 2018, an increase of 27% from the $35 billion a year earlier.

Futures and options

Next, exchange-traded derivatives, namely futures and options, and see if these markets show similar growth trends in initial margin.

clarus3-0519.jpg

Figure 3 shows:

  • CME Base the largest with $100.8 billion, up 18% or $15.7 billion from a year earlier.
  • Ice Futures Europe is next with $45.2 billion, up 31% in US dollar terms, the first time its initial margin is higher than Eurex. 
  • Eurex with $40.1 billion, down 8% in euro terms.
  • Ice Futures US with $14.7 billion, up 19%.
  • SGX DC with $6.3 billion, up 33%.
  • ASX CLF with $3.5 billion, down 14%.

The cumulative total for these six clearing services is $211 billion on December 31, 2018, an increase of 13% from the $187 billion a year earlier.

Cash movements

Next, let’s look at the maximum total variation margin received on a single day in the quarter for selected clearing services.

clarus4-0519.jpg

Figure 4 shows:

  • The quarter ending March 31, 2018 remains the largest, with a $31 billion total for these five clearing services, while the most recent quarter total was $25.6 billion.
  • CME with the largest total in the most recent quarter of $10.2 billion.

Credit risk

Now let’s change focus and look at a credit risk disclosure; the estimated largest aggregate stress loss – in excess of initial margin – that would be caused by the default of any single participant and its affiliates in extreme but plausible market conditions expressed as a peak day amount in the past 12 months.

clarus5-0519.jpg

Figure 5 shows:

  • Twelve clearing services where this exposure is greater than $1 billion in the year ending December 31, 2018.
  • OCC is the largest with $4.1 billion and is slightly down from a year earlier.
  • LCH SwapClear is next with $4 billion, significantly up from $2.7 billion a year earlier.
  • JSCC ETP (Index Futures & Options) and CCG Bond each with greater than $3 billion and higher than a year earlier.

Large amounts indeed, but we know these are extreme stress losses and these members will have significant default fund contributions in addition to their initial margin.

There is another disclosure, the actual largest aggregate credit exposure – in excess of initial margin – to any single participant and its affiliates, also expressed as a peak day amount in the past 12 months.

clarus6-0519.jpg

Figure 6 shows:

  • Seven of the 12 clearing services have a non-zero number.
  • Ice Futures Europe is by far the largest at $1.2 billion, massively up from $65 million a year earlier.
  • Eurex with $324 million and DTCC NSCC with $235 million. 

Ice Futures Europe disclosures for the quarter ending September 2018 (not shown) also show the $1.2 billion number, so it may be related to the extreme market moves in energy markets around the time of the Einar Aas default at Nasdaq. 

While $1.2 billion is a large number and almost four times higher than the next largest clearing service, it is some comfort to know that it is far less than the estimated stress losses of $2.1 billion and $2.6 billion for Ice Futures Europe in figure 5. It would be a real worry if it was not.  

Amir Khwaja is chief executive of Clarus Financial Technology

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: