Isda disputes excessive FRTB charges for carbon trading

EU carbon certificates show lower volatility and higher netting than Basel approach assumes

carbon emissions

Capital requirements have been set disproportionately high for carbon emissions trading under trading book capital rules, according to a study published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.

“Banks will not allocate scarce capital to businesses that have low return on capital,” says Mark Gheerbrant, global head of risk and capital at Isda. “Imposing disproportionately high capital charges that do not reflect the underlying risk will potentially drive banks away from that

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: